You are hereChase Cards Regroups on Change of Terms

Chase Cards Regroups on Change of Terms

By Dave - Posted on 27 March 2009

Late last year, Chase's credit card division decided to change the terms on accounts where customers had taken advantage of low-rate loans which were to be paid back over "the life of the balance".

Now credit card issuers change terms all the time. The reason these changes stood out because it took accounts with existing promotional balances in good standing and imposed two new conditions on them:

1. a $10 monthly "finance charges" on the cards, whether open or closed; and
2. an increase in monthly minimum payments due from 2% to 5% of the remaining balance.

These changes unleashed a firestorm of criticism. To date, at least twelve class-action lawsuits have been filed against Chase over this action. Dr. Robert Lahm, who was himself affected by the change in terms, has done a thorough job tracking these lawsuits and related developments at the site he devoted to this issue, .

Well today, Chase announced that they would be rescinding the $10 "finance charge", but not the increase in minimum payments.

This was a shrewd tatical move on Chase's part. They now can now better advance their claim that they are "helping" these cardmembers pay down their balances, since newly imposed montly fees won't be uncutting that argument. More important, they leave themselves in a better legal position. Several of the class actions turn on the claim that in imposing this "finance charge" on prior balances subject to a "fixed rate", Chase is violating Truth in Lending and related statutes.

It's crucial to emphasize here that this new "finance charge" was always of secondary importance to Chase. What drove the change in terms was Chase's desire to get unprofitable loans off their books in light of two new factors. Those are first, the collapse of the marked for securitized credit card debt; and second, the increased default rates by credit card customers as a result of the larger economic downturn. These two factors make carrying customer debt much more costly for Chase than it was at the time they extended the promotional rates. Thus Chase's main prize here is getting that low-rate financing paid off. Extra revenue from newly imposed "finance charges" is simply trivial by comparison.

Chase's retracted "finance charges" have already advanced their primary objective even after being reversed in full. Many cardmembers opted to pay off their Chase debts first, as soon as they realized that if they did not, this new finance charge would put them further in the hole with each passing month? We'll never know. I can say that I've been personlly contacted by several people who felt they had no choice but to pay off Chase first, among all their debtors. While they will get up to $30 in new fees credited back, Chase is not offering to reinstate the low-rate loans these customers were opting to carry prior to being hit with the fee change.

We'll be watching this issue closely going forward. We would appreciate any feedback you may have. Please write to us at chase dot rethinkingmoney dot com . We'd especially appreciate hearing from any of you who have been affected by this change of terms living in Washington State. Thank you!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

That's basically the reason why you should have a look at the credit card terms & conditions before opting for one. We have a website about electronic merchant systems, do check it for complete information on complete selection of credit card terminals.


hat just happened on 09/22/2009. A group of children were riding there bikes on Pacheco Blvd (Highway 152) and were attempting to cross at the Food 4 Less shopping center intersection. Two of the boys ages 5 and 10 were on 1 bike (the 5 year old was standing on the back pegs), when a man ran a red light and hit both of them, sending them flying 20 feet into the air. I am one of the witnesses and one of the first people that ran and tried to help. I saw everything from start to finish. The pulled over immediatley and sat on the curb. He was totally unremorseful for his wrong doing and never attempted to even see if either of the boys were okay. Both boys were airlifted to different hospitals. The 5 year old whose name is Alex was pretty much purnounced dead on impact and was revived and remained on life support for 2 days for organ donation. The 10 year old suffered minor injuries and was released the next day. online university

Well they have already lost millions of dollars in credit card loans during the current economic downtown and then there is this new credit card act which is going into effect from this coming February. And as a result they are naturally finding additional ways to increase their revenue and it will obviously comes at the expense of cardholder. So watch out for new actions and announcement from them.

Accept Credit Card

Chase's credit card division decided to change the terms on accounts where customers had taken advantage of low-rate loans which were to be paid back over "the life of the balance".

What about insurances.

Personal Injury Claims

I believe in self-employment and in choosing a profession which makes a better world, and a better self.under armour

I am agree with you and really thanks for share this, with us
Solar Power Torches | Organic Maternity Clothes | Handmade Photo Albums

In my opinion banks are taking much more advantages from customers then vice versa. And this is because many people decide to do all the jobs by themselves and they chose not to work with professional people like surety bonds for example.

Thanks for this great news.......

Debt Consolidation UK | Debt Management | Duvets


Are you a human?
5 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.


Bookmark Us

Bookmark Website 
Bookmark Page